By Amelia Marceau - April 6, 2021
Discussing ways to address a high school mental health crisis is a difficult subject because, despite many mainstream news sources raising concerns about deteriorating student mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, the data used to support the concerns is often unreliable, taken out of context, or contradictory.
Undoubtedly mental health issues exist among high school students – but they always have. Most children have not had sufficient life experiences that enable them to cope with change; and, as long ago as the 1940s and 1950s, child development psychologists identified that the failure of children to cope with change can manifest as anxiety, which can develop into a mental health disorder.
The work done by child development psychologists more than half a century ago has shaped the way in which the current generation of students is generally better prepared for change; and, although modern-day life experiences may be different, the three most common causes of anxiety in students remain the same – separation anxiety, social anxiety, and irrational anxiety (phobias).
What's prompted the current volume of student mental health concerns is that, when the COVID-19 pandemic forced the mass closure of high schools, every child simultaneously experienced a change they were not prepared for. Consequently, rather than students' separation, social, and irrational anxieties being distributed over the school year, they all developed at the same time.
Quantifying the scale of the mental health crisis is difficult because data used to support claims of worsening student mental health are most often self-reported. Studies into the reliability of self-reported data relating to mental health have found discrepancies of up to 30% between perception and reality; and, with there being a strong likelihood that school-aged children don't understand the difference between feeling sad and feeling anxious, the discrepancy could be far greater.
It is also impossible to quantify the scale of the mental health crisis by the number of students seeking mental health counseling. Following the 2018 Parkland shooting, hundreds of millions of dollars were invested in hiring more school counselors, increasing the number of school psychologists, and training teachers on recognizing signs of anxiety. Consequently, the increase in students seeking mental health counseling is likely attributable to more counseling being available.
A further consideration with regards to the increasing number of students seeking mental health counseling is that, since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, most counseling services have moved online. This has enabled students who may not otherwise have sought counseling due to self-stigma and disclosure expectations to reach out for help. It may also be the case that, by hosting counseling sessions virtually, counselors are able to host more virtual sessions than in-person sessions.
The difficulty in discussing how to address a high school mental health crisis is further compounded by concerns about mental health being taken out of context or crises reports contradicting each other. For example, while any teenage suicide is a distressing event, reports of teenage suicides being on the increase due to the COVID-19 pandemic are often taken out of context. A national ER study of teenage suicide ideation and attempts before and during COVID-19 found no increase at all.
In respect of crises reports contradicting each other, one widely-read education website reported within a week that students were both “increasingly relying on schools for mental health support” and “not taking advantage of counseling center services”. While it may be the case that students are approaching teachers with their mental health concerns more than counseling centers because they have more trust in their teachers, the reports are not helpful in determining the extent of the crisis.
Therefore, before even attempting to address a high school mental health crisis, schools and school districts need to quantify the scale of the mental health crisis in their areas and determine the nature of student mental health disorders so that appropriate resource can be directed to helping students most in need. Ideally it would also be helpful to establish:
Despite the hundreds of millions of dollars invested in student mental health services, schools are still under-resourced with regards to supporting every student's mental health. Fortunately there are tools that can help schools quantify the scale of a mental health crisis, determine the nature of mental health disorders, and establish where mental health services should be prioritized. One of the benefits of these tools is that they use a use a communication channel most students prefer.
SMS text messaging platforms with polling capabilities enable schools to send daily text messages to students enquiring about their mental health. The content of the text messages is tailored in a Q&A format so that students can respond to the questions by pressing a number on their mobile keypads. The questions need not be intrusive into students' state of mind and can be sent on a year-by-year basis so they are age appropriate. An example of how this might work could be:
With the exception of A1, the remaining three answers could be indicators of anxiety; and although individually, the questions and answers may not indicate a student mental health issue, the text messaging platform can be configured to automatically send a follow-up message depending on the answer given to the initial message. For example, in response to “Possibly. I had a really bad night” a follow-up Q&A could enquire:
The answers to each text message are recorded on the message platform along with a list of students who have not replied to the Q&A poll. Schools need to determine how they respond to the different responses and non-responses based on their knowledge of the individual students, but the opportunity exist to automatically send further Q&As to students who replied “Stuff going on in my head” to determine exactly what “stuff” is keeping the student awake at night.
Students with mental health disorders often wave red flags as their condition deteriorates. These red flags may be verbal conversations with other students, social media posts, signs of withdrawal, or other indicators they are struggling to cope. By providing an anonymous tip texting service, schools encourage students to share concerns they have about their peers with those who can provide support to struggling students and prevent the condition further deteriorating.
Similar to text messages platforms, anonymous tip texting services collate reported concerns so schools can prioritize student assistance according to the number of anonymous reports they receive or the nature of the reports. Anonymous tip services that also support photo and video messaging can be vital in assessing whether a student mental health event has the potential to deteriorate into an emergency with an immediate threat to life or harm to others.
To find out more about tools to help establish where mental health services should be prioritized, do not hesitate to get in touch. Our team of school safety experts will be happy to organize a demo of the tools in action so you can see how the theory works in practice. Our team will also be happy to discuss further uses for the tools to support student safety as schools re-open. Although adjusting to a new normal may only be a short-term issue, if the child development psychologists of the 1940s and 1950s are right, student mental health issues will exist long after the pandemic is over.
Amelia is a marketing intern at Rave. She loves to write about anything safety related. When she’s away from the keyboard, you’ll either find her playing with her dog, ice skating, or competing in a triathlon. Amelia attends the University of Massachusetts Amherst, majoring in Political Science and Journalism.